Years of research have led me to a few conclusions. One is that catastrophic pole shifts devastate the surface of the Earth roughly every 13,000 years. Second is that “Ice Ages” are merely local problems resulting from areas being rotated into a polar area for 13,000 years. Third is that the trigger for such earth changes is a combination of terrestrial, solar, and cosmic cycles that are probably controlled and triggered by what Dr. Paul LaViolette called a “galactic superwave.”
As he describes it in books like Earth Under Fire, the black hole at the center of our galaxy has an active phase in which it spews out light, radiation, gravity waves, and dust. The galaxy is full of expanding spherical shells, 13,000 light years apart, emanating from the center of the galaxy and spreading outwards towards and past Earth (and every other star and planet) triggering cyclic pole shifts and supernova across the galaxy.
We can’t detect an incoming superwave because it travels at light speed. When one arrives here it will be about 23,000 years old. But we can see similar expanding waves in other spiral galaxies, and we can pay attention to myths and ancient records of such devastating events. For example, the Greek Historian Diodorus wrote of such an event that by his reckoning occurred approximately 10,718 BC – and he said there were less detailed records of another event around 23,000 BC.
I think we are due for the next pole shift soon – and in End Times and 2019 I detail the clues in biblical prophecy that point to the week of December 21-28, 2019 as a possible time frame for the next catastrophe.
What got my attention in news from August 12 is a sudden 75-fold increase in output from the black hole at our galactic center (known as Sagittarius A)
Wakey wakey, rise and shine! Black hole begins flashing, scientists baffled
So, on the one hand we have NASA/UCLA/Keck disclosing something that cannot be corroborated (and has no zodiacal relationship), and on the other hand they have yet to disclose our second sun, that is corroborated (that we’re in a zodiacal orbit with).
And you think the former is the more convincing cause of pole shift?
I think both of us emphasize what we consider most likely.
I’m just intrigued as to why you cleave to a ‘galactic core’ type of causation as opposed to something local to the solar system.
The former implies that all, mostly binary, stars in the galaxy (with various orbital periods) are inflicted with some kind of energy burst – with a regularity that just so happens to coincide with half a great year (peculiar to our solar system’s orbital period about its binary) – that via some unknown mechanism, triggers the Earth’s crust to slip violently.
There nothing to support such a deus ex machina, except the inventions of NASA (intended to distract and divert).
Douglas Vogt seems to have amassed evidence of a universal reset every 12,000+ years.