Election Fraud: Trump Won by a Much Bigger Margin Than Reported – And It Matters A Lot

Election Fraud: Trump Won by a Much Bigger Margin Than Reported – And It Matters A Lot

I knew the mainstream polling results, especially those results put out by Hart Research (paid by Hillary’s PAC, as I posted a few weeks ago) are biased and bogus.  Hillary was not far ahead in the polls, not in real polls of real American opinions.  Contacts in several states told me before the election that Trump was truly ahead by a wide margin, 2 to 1, even 3 to 1 in many states… and to expect a Trump victory because the liberal media was lying about Hillary’s popular support.

I stayed up late on election night, wondering if Trump would really be allowed to win.  And obviously he was – barely, by a small margin.  But in watching the official counts until the wee hours, I noticed a disturbing pattern of events:

1 – In my own precinct, the first words I heard upon entering the building to vote around 9AM were that someone had just finished fixing problems with the voting machines.  That already sounded suspicious.

2 – Online later in the day, I saw several articles about my home state of Pennsylvania for reports of election fraud in Hillary’s favor, while voting was still in progress.  “CBS News reports that Trump voters in Pennsylvania are seeing their votes switched to Hillary Clinton. ‘I went back, pressed Trump again. Three times I did this, so then I called one of the women that were working the polls over. And she said you must be doing it wrong. She did it three times and it defaulted to Hillary every time,’ Bobbie Lee Hawranko said. As we reported earlier, Trump supporters are also seeing voting machines change their votes in Philadelphia.” “Video footage posted on Twitter shows an African-American man attempting to vote for Donald Trump in Pennsylvania but the voting machine refusing to select any other option than Hillary Clinton.”

3 – Late that night, once Trump seemed to be winning, all major online sites covering the election results live stopped updating the vote count.  Trump was significantly ahead when I last looked after midnight EST.

4 – States like Arizona and Michigan which seemed like they should have been called for Trump weren’t; they were considered undecided.  The next morning was the same thing, with those last states with a Trump majority “undecided” – giving Trump only a slight electoral advantage of 279 – just 9 electoral votes over the 270 needed to win.

5 – The popular vote numbers had changed a lot since the night before, and now showed Hillary winning the popular vote.

6 – What happened in Pennsylvania happened in other states too.  “Report: Votes Switched From Trump To Hillary in Texas” – http://www.infowars.com/report-votes-switched-from-trump-to-hillary-in-texas/

7 – I spoke to one election official, a “Judge of Elections” who had witnessed serious fraud in the way the electronic voting machines had been programmed to count votes.  If someone filled in the box for a straight party vote, all Republican or all Democrat, that voter was not supposed to fill in any other boxes for individual candidates, or it would be a voided ballot, technically called “overvoting.”  The machines were supposed to reject all such ballots, and the voter would be instructed to attempt to vote correctly a second time.  But the machines only did this if the straight party Republican box was marked.  If the voter overvoted by marking the straight party Democrat box, plus boxes beneath it for individual politicians, the machines counted it TWICE.  But they ONLY counted double for Democrats.

I was told: “I watched the machine go from 618 to 620 on one Democratic vote.  And that happened about a hundred times out of about seven hundred voters.”  My source called up the chain to report the fraud and was repeatedly told “That’s normal, it’s not a problem.”  Other Judges of Elections elsewhere told my source that their electronic voting machines were switching Republican votes to Democrat votes in some areas, though that did not happen for my source.  There was also an issue when Democratic Party underlings tried to get my source to write additional names onto the registered voter list and allow these undocumented and unregistered people to vote.

Most importantly, I am told that about one in five Democratic votes counted twice, but not a single Republican one was treated that way by the voting machines.  The machines were obviously programmed to cheat in Hillary’s favor.  My source believes that if the same things were going on everywhere, then one out of six votes for Hillary weren’t real, and that Hillary lost the true popular vote by a wide margin – instead of a virtual tie, the reality would be at least 6 to 5 in favor of Trump – if his votes were all real votes, and a sixth of Hillary’s shouldn’t exist, then she lost by about 12 million votes – if the same trend witnessed by the Judge of Elections I interviewed occurred nationwide.

Some of you might be thinking: “Who Cares?  Trump Won, so who cares by how much?”

But if the truth is that Trump won the popular vote and the electoral college in a LANDSLIDE, not only would he have a strong mandate to make changes – more importantly, no one would challenge the results of the election, or try to change the results.

Instead there are articles like:

“”The Election was stolen” If so, what now?” – http://www.caucus99percent.com/comment/210147 – and – http://www.eastcountymagazine.org/election-was-stolen-%E2%80%93-here%E2%80%99s-how – in which Greg Pallast claims an evil Republican software called “Crosscheck” removes voters eligibility if the same name comes up multiple times at different locations.

“Time For Obama to Declare An All Out Judiciary & Litigative War on The Rigged Election” – http://www.opednews.com/articles/Time-For-Obama-To-Declare-by-Rob-Kall-Election-Fraud_Election-Integrity_Election-Investigations_Election-Recounts-Protests-161111-110.html

“Did Trump Steal Wisconsin?” http://urbanmilwaukee.com/2016/11/11/murphys-law-did-trump-win-wisconsin-fairly/

Could Democratic protests lead to contested states and recounts (as in 2000) but this time with a change in the outcome?  Half the country would back it up, even if completely illegal.

I think anything could still happen in regard to this election.  Trump could be allowed to take office uneventfully in January 2017.  Democrats could try to steal the election for Hillary.  A crisis like major terrorism, war, or financial collapse could lead Obama to declare martial law and invoke (dictatorial) special presidential powers and nullify the election.  Trump could be allowed to take power as a scapegoat for imminent economic collapse.  Almost anything could happen, and we won’t know for sure until late 2017 whether all these thoughts are just silly conspiracy theories or valid concerns.