you're reading...
Columbia, Cuba, John Kerry, Kerry, Obama, other, terrorism, terrorists

John Kerry and Obama Friendly With Terrorists With $5M Bounty on Their Heads

From the full original article: John Kerry’s New Terror Treason —


“Stop by your local post office and you might just see a poster of Rodrigo “Timochenko” Londono hanging next to the Most Wanted posters of bank robbers and fugitives. The State Department is offering a $5 million reward for information about the Communist terrorist leader.

But all the State Department had to do was ask Secretary of State Kerry. Obama did the wave with the Cuban dictator and Kerry met with Timochenko , the leader of FARC, a Marxist terrorist organization that appears on his own department’s list of foreign terrorist organizations a little above Al Qaeda.

Timochenko is a Communist who was trained at the USSR’s infamous Patrice Lumumba University. The State Department accuses him of ordering the kidnapping of Americans and responsibility for much of the cocaine that is smuggled into the United States. But none of that bothered Kerry who accepted a signed copy of a memoir by the terror group’s former leader which was addressed to “Senor” Kerry.

The signatures in Kerry’s new keepsake include Pablo Catatumbo, a FARC leader with a $2.5 million reward on his head from the State Department, who is wanted for “the production, manufacture, and distribution of hundreds of tons of cocaine to the United States and the world” and “the murder of hundreds of people who violated or interfered with the FARC’s cocaine policies.”Also signing Kerry’s book was Iván Márquez, who has a $5 million reward on his head for most of the same reasons.

Two of the men sitting opposite John Kerry had been convicted of forcing children to join the terror group as soldiers and sex slaves. FARC runs on thousands of child soldiers and sex slaves. Little girls as young as 7 and 9 were brought into the terror group whose fronts have a “quota” of women to fill. Families that refuse to turn over their daughters to FARC have been massacred as a warning to others.

Rape is a typical tactic for the military arm of the Colombian Communist Party. Children were seized from families. Others were “bought” from kidnappers operating in cities. Girls who became pregnant had their children forcibly aborted so the babies wouldn’t interfere with their job of servicing male fighters who protected the narcotics trade while keeping the dream of a Communist dictatorship alive.

But Kerry’s new Communist narcoterrorist chums also had American blood on their hands.

“Take them across the river and burn them.” That was how the lives of three left-wing American environmental activists had ended in the spring of 1999. Their killers were members of the FARC Marxist terror group. The victims were shot in the face after being tortured.

…It’s also possible that Obama may hand over Simon Trinidad, a FARC commander serving a sixty-year sentence for his role in taking three American hostages.  Freeing Trinidad has become a popular cause for American leftists.

The three hostages, Marc Gonsalves, Thomas Howes, and Keith Stansell, were held for 5 years until they were rescued. Their pilot, 56-year-old Tom Janis, a Vietnam veteran and Bronze Star recipient, was shot. He left behind a wife and four children. Tom is yet another Vietnam vet betrayed by John Kerry.

Mark Rich, David Mankins, and Rick Tenenoff, three missionaries, were kidnapped and murdered by FARC. As were two other missionaries, Tim Van Dyke and Steve Welsh. Frank Pescatore, a geologist, was kidnapped and murdered by FARC in 1996. The Marxist terrorists packed his body with lime and formaldehyde and tried to pretend that he was still alive in the hopes of collecting a ransom for him.

…FARC’s war on America dates back to 1983 when the Marxist terror group took its first American hostage. Its last American hostage, Kevin Scott Sutay, an ex-Marine, was freed only a few years ago.

Now wanted FARC terrorists have met with Kerry and attended a baseball game with Obama. These are some of the most direct contacts possible. The indictments issued by Attorney General Ashcroft and Gonzalez are null and void. The rewards will eventually be erased by the State Department.

The Bush Administration had parted ways with Clinton’s pandering to terrorists. Instead it indicted FARC leaders and helped Colombia target them with smart bombs. Martin Caballero, a FARC commander who had plotted to bomb Clinton was blown away. As was Raul Reyes, who had been indicted in the abduction of the three American hostages.

But the victories against FARC have been thrown away once again. The peace deal gives FARC the breathing room it needs. At their meeting with Kerry, FARC leaders asked for American protection. And there is little doubt that they will receive it. Obama bailed out Cuba and intends to bail out its FARC terror group. Its American victims will never see justice. Instead their killers and torturers will thrive.

In an administration of endless lows, Secretary of State John Kerry has found a new low by meeting with wanted terrorists from a Marxist organization with American blood on its hands.

“This Cuba policy is also our Latin American policy,” Ben Rhodes boasted. Rhodes is the man who wrote Obama’s Cairo speech. The Cuba policy is solidarity with Communist enemies of the United States. Reversing JFK’s inaugural address, Obama and Kerry will pay any price, oppose any friend and support any foe in order to assure the death and defeat of liberty. That much they have pledged and done.

50 years after Kerry first turned traitor, his betrayal of the United States continues without end.”

About David Montaigne

Historian, investigator, and author of prophecy books like End Times and 2019, and Antichrist 2016-2019


2 thoughts on “John Kerry and Obama Friendly With Terrorists With $5M Bounty on Their Heads

  1. Hello David, I have been following your messages as of late. I cought your interview on John Baptist. It was very very interesting. I have seen websites promoting the exodus to Petra. And it is open to anyone who has the means to get there. What bothers me is all throughout the bible, father has spoken to men personally, or in dreams or visions. This has been his way since Adam. Why would he change now? And as I recall he didn’t give years of warning or even weeks!! He gave his command and it was so. I’m having a battle with this. Yes I feel that the world is coming to a climax and I know in my soul that Father is hurt and angry with his creation. Yet he allows satan to continue to plague the earth. I also feel that he is holding back because he is aware of those that are like Job, Noah, etc… And are living sin free and doing his will. I think you have been blessed with a very good insight, but as it is written, only Father truly knows dates and times, and of coarse they can change, for he is the almighty power! Your thoughts would be appreciated. Marianne

    Sent from my iPad


    Posted by Marianne Mazzenga | April 1, 2016, 12:35 pm
    • God has often communicated through dreams and visions. As for “as it is written, only Father truly knows dates and times” I think that is clearly wrong once you look past the English language version of Matthew 24:36. As I have written in my Antichrist 2016-2019 book: “The problem, up until the threshold of the end times, is that some of the crucial information is withheld from us. In Daniel 12:4 the Archangel Gabriel tells “Daniel, conceal these words and seal up the book until the end of time; many will go back and forth, and knowledge will increase.” Until the end times, when such knowledge will be increased, some Bible prophecy is sealed – restricted. I believe that it only became possible to calculate a prophetic timeline as we drew close to the final years.

      But millions of people believe that we can’t know – or aren’t ever supposed to know – when future events are going to occur. Many American Christians read Matthew 24:36, in which their English-language Bible tells them “no one knows the hour or the day” and they assume that we can never know future dates. But the original Greek verb οἶδεν (“oiden”) in Matthew 24:36 is past tense; Young’s Literal Translation reads “no one hath known” – and the correct modern translation is “no one has known” or “no one knows yet.”
      No one – not even Jesus Christ – knew then, in 33 A.D. As Philippians 2:7 tells us, He “emptied Himself, taking the form of a bond-servant, and being made in the likeness of men.” To better experience humanity, He chose not to access His divine knowledge – but only during the Incarnation.

      Haven’t we all said: “I don’t know,” only to find out the answer later? If we had asked a scientist 200 years ago why uranium is radioactive, he may have said “No one knows.” That doesn’t mean we don’t know today. But readers of English Bibles looking at Matthew 24:36 read a statement about not knowing something in the past, and forever misinterpret it to mean that we can never know – when the Bible specifically tells us that all will be revealed. As John Walvoord (author, theologian and 34-year president of Dallas Theological Seminary) has written: “Because of imperfect translations, some important truth is hidden to the one who reads only the English text of the Bible.” I have found that to be an understatement.

      In English, Mark 6:3 asks: “Is not this the carpenter, the son of Mary?” I never heard anyone question that Jesus was a carpenter – until I discussed Him with Israelis and Palestinians, who said: “Look around (we were in Nazareth) – do you see a lot of trees? Everything in Israel is built out of stone.” Where I live, wood is plentiful. Pennsylvania even means “Penn’s Woods.” We build wooden homes. Not in Israel. In the original Greek text of the Bible Jesus is referred to as a “tekton” (τεκτων) which means “builder” or “craftsman” – more likely a stonemason than a carpenter. Like the “no one knows” in Matthew 24:36 – is the carpenter idea another false assumption Americans have gotten stuck with because of poor translation?

      Did Jesus ever use wood or carpentry metaphors in his parables or sermons?
      He repeatedly uses stone metaphors – He changes Simon’s name to Peter (stone is “petra” in Greek) and says to him in Matthew 16:18 “you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build My church.” Jesus Himself is referred to as a stone, such as “a living stone which has been rejected,” (1 Peter 2:4) or “the stone which the builders rejected, this became the chief corner stone,” (Matthew 21:42) or “I am laying in Zion a stone, a tested stone, a costly cornerstone for the foundation” (Isaiah 28:16) or the “top stone” (capstone) in Zechariah 4:7. In Nazareth, they politely suggest that they portray Jesus as a carpenter because that is what American tourists expect – but that in the Middle East He has always been viewed as a stonemason.
      We too often assume we understand something without investigating. Whether Jesus cut wood or stone doesn’t affect much. But misunderstanding Matthew 24:36 and assuming we can never know the timing of future events in advance does matter. Of course the main point of the verse, in full context, was to emphasize that when Christ returns for us it is like a groom coming for his bride. This had already been explained in Matthew 22:2 “The kingdom of heaven may be compared to a king who gave a wedding feast for his son.” In ancient Israel, when a couple decided to marry, the groom would pay the bride price to her father, then leave to build at least one new room at his father’s house, where the couple would live after the groom’s father felt the construction was complete. Only the groom’s father could decide the new home was ready and no one else could plan a wedding date before he approved. So when the apostles asked Jesus when He would come back (to claim us, His bride) He replied: “of that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels of heaven, nor the Son, but the Father alone.” He was making an important comparison to a groom returning for a bride.

      God has always known the date of the heavenly wedding. And eventually, the groom and the bride and other guests must know the date as well; it is a crucial part of the invitation. In Isaiah 45:19 God suggests: “I have not spoken in secret.” Daniel 2:28 says “there is a God in heaven who reveals mysteries… what will take place in the latter days.” A correct translation of Matthew 24:36 suggests that we simply don’t know yet. And many passages suggest that we will know someday: Luke 8:17 says “For nothing is hidden that will not become evident, nor anything secret that will not be known and come to light.” So when Acts 17:31 tells us “He has fixed a day in which He will judge the world,” we will eventually know the date.

      If it were true that we will never know such things – that would invalidate Bible prophecy, especially the Book of Revelation. “The very word, ‘Revelation’ (Apokalupsis) of Revelation 1:1 signifies a ‘disclosure’ of something previously unknown, hidden, or beclouded.” All will be revealed. When will the timing be right to fully reveal the identity of the Antichrist and all the other details of end times prophecy? Not until the second half of the final seven years. In Daniel 12:4 the archangel Gabriel explained the meaning of Daniel’s visions to him, but told him to “conceal these words and seal up the book until the end of time.” Sometimes, as Paul explained in 2 Corinthians 12:4, a prophet is allowed to have a special understanding of the future, but then “is not permitted to speak.”
      We were not meant to know all the details in the days of Daniel – or Matthew – but all is revealed before the end, and I think the evidence shows that we are already in the first half of Daniel’s 70th week: “a seven-year period that will become more and more intense as we get closer to Christ’s second coming.” It must seem very convenient that I come up with dates in our very near future. But based on scripture, the only time anyone could correctly deduce the time of the end is right before the end! You may wonder – what makes my interpretation uniquely correct when so many other date-setters have failed? Most of them based their dates on nothing. Soon you will see the mass of evidence I have put together – then you can judge for yourself if it is impressive enough to take my timeline seriously.

      Most Christians were also taught that when Jesus returns “He will come like a thief in the night.” This is another misunderstanding based on Revelation 3:3, which tells us to pay attention: “If you do not wake up, I will come like a thief, and you will not know at what hour I will come.” But as Mark Biltz explains: “Many people tell me they thought Messiah is supposed to come as a thief in the night. They are correct, but we have to read in context to whom He comes as a thief in the night.” This is conditional – not knowing is only for those who do not wake up. If we do pay attention – if we are “awake” to the clues we are given – then we can know – as suggested in 1 Thessalonians 5:4 “But you, brethren, are not in darkness, that the day would overtake you like a thief.” Faithful servants are awake to the truth and aware of the clues.

      The comparison to a “thief in the night” was a reference to the Jewish Temple’s high priest and the Temple guards, and how they would be perceived by a Temple priest only if that priest neglected his duties and fell asleep at his post. The Hebrew people believed that the fire of the altar in their Temple was a heavenly fire brought down by God, and that this special flame could never be replaced if their eternal flame went out. So it was very important for Temple priests to keep watch. If they fell asleep while guarding the Temple, looters could steal gold and silver – or far worse – the sacred fire of the altar could burn out. So the high priest and other Temple guards made their rounds to repeatedly check on the priest on duty overnight. If they found him sleeping, they would set his robe on fire. The shame of a burned robe, coupled with the fear of being burned, generally kept the priests awake on their watch. To a priest who was awake, the coming of the High Priest was friendly and expected as scheduled. But if the priest was asleep, his master’s arrival would be terrifying.

      The lesson for the weary priest on night watch was “Don’t fall asleep when you should be watching. If you are awake and watching, then the high priest will arrive as a friend at the hour you expect him. If you are neglecting your duty to God and are asleep, then you will be burned.” Remember Hebrews 9:11 “when Christ appeared as a high priest” and Hebrews 10:21 “and since we have a great priest over the house of God…” Jesus is our High Priest of God’s Temple! The lesson for Christians today is: Think about what the Bible says and be awake to its clues; then when the highest priest of all comes back, it will be exactly when you expected Him, and you will be ready, and He will come as a friend. If you choose to neglect what the Bible says and be mentally asleep, He will come as a thief in the night….”

      I could quote a lot more on that, but the excerpt above is pretty long already. I believe (even if my theory/timeline/calculations prove to be wrong) that we CAN know the hour and the day, because events since Daniel have already revealed key insights that were “sealed” 2500 years ago.

      While I hoped that events like a new Temple in Jerusalem would already be in place by now, it is very possible that things could still happen this June, and we could be blissfully unaware of what is coming right up until the day catastrophes begin. Another book excerpt: “Matthew 24:38-39 warns us that most people will be blissfully unaware: “For as in those days before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noah entered the ark, and they did not understand until the flood came and took them all away; so will the coming of the Son of Man be.” Future events, even if expected by the few, may suddenly surprise almost the entire world.

      Or I could be wrong. You can read all my evidence if you are interested in deciding for yourself.

      Posted by David Montaigne | April 1, 2016, 2:20 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow END TIMES PROPHECY on WordPress.com

POLE SHIFT: Evidence Will Not Be Silenced

Evidence suggests that pole shifts are both magnetic and geophysical, with a periodic cycle of recurring and predictable cataclysms involving huge earthquakes and tsunamis, changes in latitude and altitude, mass extinctions, and the destruction of civilizations, reducing them to myth and legend.

Nostradamus and the Islamic Invasion of Europe

Nostradamus and the Islamic Invasion of Europe

Nostradamus prophecies suggest Europe will suffer greatly before WWIII ends in 2028.

Translate This!

%d bloggers like this: